Jimmy Dore is spot on!

Amen, I think?

Tag someone and say nothing

What on earth 😂Credit: Healthy Brains

Posted by VT on Thursday, November 2, 2017

Trixie Mattel’s Lady Bunny impersonation!

From Tupperware to trans: The Journey of “Aunt Barbara”

I love her in any incarnation she chooses!

An open letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren @SenWarren

Dear Elizabeth Warren. Thanks for confirming Donna Brazile’s assertions that the DNC was run by the Clinton campaign and it shafted Bernie Sanders’ chances at the nomination. Democrats look to you as a progressive beacon within the establishment so you gave Brazile’s bombshell accusations credence for all democrats. (Even though Brazile has been working for the Clintons since Bill was in office–few Clinton loyalists are more loyal than Donna–so Clinonists should believe her if anyone.) Bernie supporters feel vindicated, but we aren’t rejoicing. We didn’t want Trump in the White House, either, and feel that unlike Clinton, Bernie could’ve beaten him.

But Liz, if you’re so progressive, why’d you wait so long? Are you not a principled leader who has the decency to call out corruption in your party apparatus while it’s happening? When it could impact the choice of nominee and give us one who might not lose to Trump? You just wait for Donna Brazile, already disgraced and fired from CNN by feeding Clinton email questions, to spill the beans? If that’s leadership, I’m Marilyn Monroe.

And why didn’t you endorse Bernie Sanders in your state of Massachusetts if you’re so damned progressive? No one could call Clinton progressive. Even after Bernie beat her in 22 states, sent her limping to the convention and she was forced to adopt many of his policies which she’d just spent the primaries denouncing as radical or pie-in-the-sky. With Bill Clinton posing for selfies in Massachusetts polling places, Sanders needed your help, Elizabeth, and you now claim you saw him being kneecapped by the DNC. Maybe you’re just a career politician who would didn’t want to make waves within the party. (In other words, a dud who we can never count on, whose loyalty is to a party which cheats.) Or maybe you wanted a failure like Hillary to run so that you could be the first female president instead when she lost?

Whatever your reason, it’s too little too late. And your recent vote for the Trump’s $700 billion defense budget proves that not only are you not a progressive, you aren’t even a part of the resistance. Now tell me your campaign stump speech sob story again about how your dad went broke due to shaky credit card practices, and that’s why you’re such a champion for consumers. Yeah, while you endorsed Hillary, who didn’t want to regulate banks because she was funded by big finance. And sat back watched the DNC screw Sanders, who DID want to stop predatory lenders who crashed our economy and housing market. With consumer advocates like you, who needs enemies? Next!

Time to ignore establishment Democrats.

Clinton loyalists will tell you that it was fine for the DNC to cheat Bernie Sanders since he’s an Independent. Yet Clinton practically bought the party in 2015, so she also cheated these three democrats who ran in the primary: Jim Webb, Martin O’Malley and Lincoln Chafee. Not a problem for you?
 
If cheating and colluding during an election doesn’t bother you, then why are you whining about Trump’s alleged ties to Russia influencing the election? Either cheating does or does not bother you. If you welcome a tilting of the scales when your candidate does it, you have no interest in fair elections. Your messsage of “We need party unity so we can cheat the grassroots candidates again” is as absurd as you backing a candidate who cheated and still lost…to the moronic Trump! Your folly tanked the Democratic Party. Who in their right mind would take your advice now? Someone seeking more corruption and future GOP victories?

Hmmmmmm…

Trump is crazy, right? He’s angling for war in North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and who knows where else? That was one major objection to Trump from even republicans–no one wanted that hothead to have the nuclear codes and be able to bomb the earth to smithereens.
 
So why did Elizabeth Warren, Corey Booker and Kamala Harris all green light Trump’s military budget with their votes recently?
 
Look at your “progressive” democrats in the pic below–all three rising stars in the party who may run in 2020. They’d rather give Trump more defense dollars money than he asked for and then claim the US can’t afford the same single payer health care system which most industrialized countries enjoy.
 
Neoliberals are democrats who support war and corporate interests over the people they allegedly represent. Failed neoliberal policies include pointless military interventions all over the world, and cozying up to banks which crash the economy and housing market. Obama and the Clintons’ neoliberal polices (like job-killing NAFTA and TPP trade deals) are part of what handed Trump the election. When you lose to a nut job like Trump, you shift your gears, right? Not these democrats.
 
When you hear people bitch about both parties being the same, this is exactly what we mean. They are the same when it comes to defense, which 1/2 our our tax dollars go to pay for. Congress always has a fortune to spend on wars few understand. Yet these are military concerns of the elite–average Americans want less war. Spending on job creation, more affordable college and health care, rebuilding the crumbling infrastructure, helping out in Flint and Puerto Rico. etc…the money just never seems to be there. But give Trump a bigger war chest than he asks for and even the democratic rising stars are all in. Some resistance. Both Trump and the resistance need to be resisted if they are warmongers like Obama and Clinton.

 

Go, Grandpa! It’s the weekend!

What happens when the Entrance gets a hold on you.Celebrate with us! Call 708.566.6130

Posted by The Entrance Venue on Friday, June 30, 2017

Adore this!

One move can change everything

Posted by Eltara Sri'ta Mahatma on Wednesday, October 18, 2017

These are killing me!

This is Awesome Creativity

Posted by Design Ideas on Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Queen Leiomy, honey!

Queen Leiomy teaching the children

Posted by AFROPUNK on Thursday, December 8, 2016

The sickest Nina Ricci collection at Versailles!

Fashion at Versailles

Nina Ricci designs on show at Versailles Palace in France circa 1968from the archives of British Pathé

Posted by Vintage Powderpuff on Thursday, November 2, 2017

CUTENESS OVERLOAD!

Loren singing in choir this morning. In case you can’t find her she’s the one in pink and brown 😉

Posted by Jennifer Patterson on Sunday, October 29, 2017

SCREAMING!

The funniest tombstones EVER!! 😂😂

Posted by Alonzo Lerone on Wednesday, November 1, 2017

DNC revelations keep churning.

Hillary’s campaign just bought the DNC. Let’s say for the sake of argument, that Bernie is an Independent–so rigging the primary against him is therefore somehow acceptable. You’ll hear this rationale from many Clinton loyalists. But was purchasing and controlling the DNC fair to Hillary’s democratic primary challengers Martin O’Malley and Lincoln Chafee? They’re both Democrats, unlike Sanders. I know, neither of them had a chance so they withered out of the race quickly. But Hillary and the corrupt DNC weren’t only rigging the primary against an Independent like Sanders who some feel had no right to run on the blue ticket. They rigged it against all opponents, even those in their own party.

PS: If you’re going to tilt the election, wouldn’t it be wise to tilt it in the direction of someone who could actually win?

INTERCEPT: “And so the DNC, to save itself, sold everything to the only bidder. The Clinton campaign bailed out the DNC and, in exchange, effectively took it over, according to Donna Brazile, who served as the organization’s acting chairperson from July 2016 to February 2017.

The agreement — signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias — specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff,” Brazile wrote in an explosive excerpt of her book published Thursday in Politico. “The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.”

Brazile’s belated acknowledgement that the DNC was, in fact, under the direct control of the Clinton campaign, rather than a neutral arbiter of the race, has enflamed a long-burning fight between Clinton’s backers and those of 2016 presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders, lending official credence to the argument that the DNC was tilted in Clinton’s favor.”

ANGRY ABOUT THE DNC SCANDAL? THANK OBAMA.

Well?

Please do not watch this on drugs!

Russian dance "Berezka" How do they do this?

Posted by Mother Russia on Friday, May 19, 2017

This killed me!

Posted by Tennessee Moonvines on Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Drag is now officially a yawn

I preferred drag when it wasn’t a uniform to be adhered to. That stifles creativity. Nowadays, many queens have immaculate make-up but nothing interesting to do on stage.

8 Amazing Drag Queen Transformations

For my next life, make me a drag queen. Check out the stunning queens here: https://www.instagram.com/vaiolona/ https://www.instagram.com/arabia.felix/ https://www.instagram.com/hellvetika/ https://www.instagram.com/thebadboosh/ https://www.instagram.com/mynxmoscato/ https://www.instagram.com/TheCandyCrash/ https://www.instagram.com/sillycondropmua/

Posted by Top Knot on Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Truth!

Joan Crawford in a rotten bonnet!

She appeared in Ice Follies on TCM tonight wearing this iffy look. Love her, but this look is nuts! It’s a testament to how striking she was that she could pull off these flat on the head looks, as many of her hairstyles were.

Powerful!

Contestants turn Miss Peru pageant into powerful protest

Miss Peru Pageant becomes protest 🔥💃🏽🔥

Posted by The Feed SBS VICELAND on Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Deranged and wonderful!

Their reactions are priceless 😂Leak of The Week: Dan Henig

Posted by Urban Leak on Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Gotta try this!

Prancercising – Ultra Spiritual Life episode 79

I've been crushing my Prancercising workouts lately…

Posted by JP Sears on Tuesday, October 24, 2017

GAG!

Tweet of the week!

Prophetic Family Guy scene?

LOL!

I wish those crying out over Russian meddling cared when the US does much worse

If Russia or any other country meddled in our elections to the point where it changed the outcome, I think most Americans would be concerned. And most would want to prosecute all guilty parties. While I agree with Republicans on practically nothing, there are reasonable GOP voters who want their voter to count more than another country’s interference in our elections.
 
However, the USA’s foreign policy doesn’t even bother with mere election-meddling. That’s too peaceful. We just invade other countries in wars based on lies like Iraq, or in “humanitarian” regime change like Obama/Clinton’s taking out of Libya’s leader Qaddafi. What’s worse? Interfering in one election, which I certainly don’t doubt that Russia did since they just financially backed a candidate in France’s race, or an entire history of overthrowing governments for no reason? 
 
There is no major political party advocating an end to the US’s failed policy of regime change. Your choices are war or war. Even in countries where there’s no military solution. If only we were as concerned with our own military meddling, which we should have some say in through our reps in Congress, as we were in proving Russia’s meddling. Russia meddles via hacking or meeting with Trump surrogates, and we lose our minds. The US routinely meddles by bombing countries to smithereens for decades, and it’s citizens say next to nothing. Oh, but decades later, we do enjoy watching misguided and failed war efforts like Vietnam as entertainment when Ken Burns makes a documentary about them?